This article looks at the House of Lords decision in Barker v Corus (UK) Plc  UKHL 20;  2 W.L.R. 1027 regarding the scope of the Fairchild principle. In particular, the article considers issues such as the claimant's own careless exposure to asbestos; apportionment; and the single agent rule. (2006) 122 LQR 547
This item is only usable by City University students with a valid username and password.
The link below will open the external site in a new window: